16

Philip R. Klein writes in his latest posting on the SET Political Review (emphasis is mine):

Two years ago, the Review was involved in a lawsuit with Justice Gilliam in which he sued the Review after allegations of sexual misconduct were made against Judge Gilliam with a secretary and a window being broken by an angry suspected girl friend / employee. The case was dismissed after the Review printed Justice Gilliam's side of the story.

Fact check: Philip R. Klein and the SET Political Review made those "allegations of sexual misconduct." Here is Klein's original retraction, which isn't what PRK describes as "Justice Gillam's side of the story:"

Questions have been raised on a story the Review covered this past year in March. So the Review made the decision to take another look at the original story and do some follow ups.

In March of 2007, sources called the Review telling us there was an incident of an encounter between a Judge and somebody – and an employee that may have been witness to the event and slammed a glass door and broke it. The Review published the story and it appeared on this website in March and again in April of this past year. It was further discussed on the Political Review Radio show on KOLE Radio.

Since that time, the Review has conducted a full and complete investigation into the claims. We have discovered numerous inaccuracies from witnesses and at least one of the original sources to the story has been found to have been lying to the Review. As well, this witness may have had a political agenda towards the judge in an attempt to run for the Judge’s office. The Review has had an opportunity to view the surveillance videotape which leads support to Judge Gillam’s side of the story.

Evidence that we now have obtained indicates that the Review must side with Judge Gilliam and his denial of the incident. Seemingly, Judge Gillam is a victim in an attempt to smear him in the court of public opinion and that is not fair to him, his family, supporters and any other public person that may choose to serve their community. In the Review’s opinion, Judge Gillam is innocent of the accusations against him.

Judge Gillam is due an apology from those that attempted to smear his name by using this web site and the media in general in an attempt to garner office.

As I pointed out at the time, Klein failed to conduct a "full and complete investigation" before he published the rumor as fact. The "media in general" avoided the story, since the unsubstantiated rumor couldn't be verified.

I'll reserve forming an opinion on the current investigation until I read more credible accounts than the SET Political Review and Klein News 4.